How much will solar panels cost you?

Provide a valid 5 digit U.S. zipcode

Subscribe to Our Blog

CEC OKs Massive Ivanpah Solar Plant in Mojave Desert

One large-scale solar thermal power plant in the Mojave Desert may be close to final approval. The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating Station (ISEGS) is at least one step closer. A site committee from the California Energy Commission has endorsed the power plant, recommending its approval by the five-member CEC.

ivanpah solar plant

If completed today, Ivanpah would be the largest solar generating station in the world, producing nearly 400 megawatts of solar electricity. But it won’t be completed today. Its developer, Oakland’s Brightsource Energy, however, does hope to begin construction this fall, with completion slated for 2014.

The plant would be located about 4.5 miles from the town of Primm, Nevada in California’s Mojave Desert. It will be a “power tower” design, utilizing large flat mirrors to concentrate sunlight onto a 459-foot tower, inside which a fluid would be boiled to create steam to drive a turbine, much like in a conventional power plant. In fact, some natural gas will be used to quickly fire up the boilers in the morning and carry the plant through minor cloud spells. The gas would not keep the plant running through extended clouds  or overnight.

Nearly 174,000 mirrors will concentrate solar energy onto three towers, the cumulative land footprint of the plant being 3,582 acres. Development and construction costs are estimated at $1.1 billion. The U.S. government has offered a loan guarantee of up to $1.37 billion to Brightsource Energy for the project.

ivanpah desert toroise

The CEC site committee’s endorsement is newsworthy only because of all the controversy surrounding concentrating solar power (CSP) plants like Ivanpah. Environmental damage to landscape, animal habitat, desert tortoises and other wildlife, plant life and water supply have all contributed to long delays for CSP projects as environmental groups demand a more sensitive approach.

In response, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) conducted environmental impact surveys (EIS) for projects in hopes of fast-tracking the permit process. Last November the BLM released its EIS for the Ivanpah project, giving the plant a positive environmental review — that is, the environmental damage caused by construction of the plant does not outweigh its environmental benefits upon completion. Nine months later, another permitting hurdle has been tackled.

But the process could be far from over. As mentioned, the CEC must take the committee’s advice by approving the project, then the BLM must still give final approval. Although, given the positive EIS and the Obama administration’s support for large-scale solar power in general, the Southwest could see the first of 126 pending solar thermal electric projects actually break ground.

There could still be some fight from environmental or labor groups, although Brightsource has made at least one significant environmental compromise: ISEGS will now be a “dry-cooled” power plant, drastically reducing annual water consumption.

Source: SunPluggers
Photo Credits: High Desert Business Journal & Gene Hanson

Posted on August 6th in Solar News by .

Related Posts

2 Responses to “CEC OKs Massive Ivanpah Solar Plant in Mojave Desert”

  1. From Brownfield to Green: Solar Power to Clean Superfund Site | CleanTechies Blog - CleanTechies.com Says:

    [...] advertisement GA_googleFillSlot("SkyScr_left-above_fold"); Share0CommentsDigg DiggShareSolar power is helping out the environment in more ways than one. In addition to producing green electricity, solar energy is helping to cure [...]

  2. robt g Says:

    I suppose it hasn’t occurred to the tree huggers that this projet/projects is about the only thing that will pull Calif out of their financial doldrums. The tortoise and everything else will survive long after we’re gone with or without the environmentalists help. As far as Green jobs are concerned, the solar projects are the only ones with intelligent credibility. The other “global warming” tripe is so farcical it borders on the pathetic. Someone better step in and take control of this insanity before we lose the state, our civil liberties, our freedoms. I don’t give a damn what you think is “politically” correct, I do however care about what IS correct. You’re environmental agenda does not correspond to mine and never will. Why?, because it’s irrational, a stilted agenda and stupid.

Leave a Reply