<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear vs. Solar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/solar-information/nuclear-vs-solar-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/solar-information/nuclear-vs-solar-2/</link>
	<description>A blog about residential solar power, brought to you by CalFinder.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:24:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Who Says Solar Power Is Bogus?</title>
		<link>http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/solar-information/nuclear-vs-solar-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Says Solar Power Is Bogus?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/1/nuclear-vs-solar-2/#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>[...] These cons are rapidly evaporating, and the long-term projections are encouraging. Some argue that nuclear power, more drilling, and wind farms are more feasible than solar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These cons are rapidly evaporating, and the long-term projections are encouraging. Some argue that nuclear power, more drilling, and wind farms are more feasible than solar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narayan</title>
		<link>http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/solar-information/nuclear-vs-solar-2/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Narayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/1/nuclear-vs-solar-2/#comment-914</guid>
		<description>While we look at the GHG emissions from all the sources we comfortablyleave the amount of GHG that goes into the production of the Solar panles. 

Especially the raw materials for the solar like Silicon, other gases and consumable all require a huge power and emits lot of GHG 

Some body need to really put his head down and work on what is the net carbon from this source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we look at the GHG emissions from all the sources we comfortablyleave the amount of GHG that goes into the production of the Solar panles. </p>
<p>Especially the raw materials for the solar like Silicon, other gases and consumable all require a huge power and emits lot of GHG </p>
<p>Some body need to really put his head down and work on what is the net carbon from this source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar</title>
		<link>http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/solar-information/nuclear-vs-solar-2/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solar.calfinder.com/blog/1/nuclear-vs-solar-2/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Solar power is renewable and non toxic. Nuclear power is larger scale and can give more bang for the buck, not to mention doesn&#039;t take up hundreds of acres to power cities. But Solar won&#039;t HARM us, it simply uses the sun and has no bi-product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar power is renewable and non toxic. Nuclear power is larger scale and can give more bang for the buck, not to mention doesn&#8217;t take up hundreds of acres to power cities. But Solar won&#8217;t HARM us, it simply uses the sun and has no bi-product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
